Are Checks and Balances on Trump Bad Now...

Online Training


Are Checks and Balances on Trump Bad Now, According to Musk and Vance?



 

Some observers believe that Elon Musk and JD Vance's comments suggest that the checks and balances on President Trump have become bad.

 

The Republican Party has rightly claimed to be the party that defends the judicial system in recent years. However, Vance and Musk are seriously undermining trust in this system in our country.

 

I am concerned, and you should be too. Judicial review is an essential element of our republic.

 

Musk is right, but not in the way he thinks. We don't live in a traditional democracy; we live in a constitutional republic. Our nation is subject to the Constitution, not the whims of the majority at any given moment.

 

That's why we have stricter checks on the executive branch. The judiciary is the primary check on presidential overreach, especially in recent years, where executive actions have surpassed those taken by Congress.

 

The judicial ruling that sparked Musk and Vance's comments was the one issued by US District Judge Paul Engelmayer, which temporarily barred Musk's government efficiency administration from accessing Treasury Department data.

 

It's one of several rulings against Trump. You may disagree with this ruling, but I question its validity to some extent. However, this decision must be challenged through proper channels, not through blatant disregard for the legal process.

 

The Trump administration should focus on appealing the case through the judiciary, possibly to the US Supreme Court, to establish a lasting outcome. Instead, Musk and Vance are undermining the rule of law in our country.

 

After criticizing Democrats for doing the same thing for years, both are hinting at moving forward in a disturbing direction. Any enhancement of judicial power to block executive action must come from within the judiciary itself.

 

Musk might be naive, but Vance is deliberate. As a novice in politics, the South African-born American citizen may not yet comprehend the intricate structure of our republic.

 

This reality is alarming for several reasons, but Vance's comments are particularly concerning due to his competence and previous statements.

 

"As President Andrew Jackson did, stand before the country and say, 'The chief justice has made his ruling; now let him enforce it.'" Vance said in 2021.

 

The vice president is an intelligent man. He recognizes that blatantly disregarding judicial rulings would encourage Democrats to do the same.

 

When the only test of a ruling's validity is the president's interpretation, any unfavorable ruling becomes instantly invalid. Vance knows this behavior would lead to the downfall of our republic.

 

Trump, a great admirer of Jackson's populist ruling, has a picture of the seventh president in the Oval Office. Let's hope Trump has someone advising him against such reckless actions. Fortunately, some of Trump's supporters are among his critics. However, I'm not holding my breath.

 

At the very least, this administration has been tampering with the rule of law, preferring radical action over caution regarding its legitimacy. I'm concerned about what's to come and hope Trump doesn't follow the path his vice president has suggested.

#buttons=(Ok, Go it!) #days=(20)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. Learn more
Ok, Go it!